On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:35:02AM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > > 2017-08-02 9:28 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Pavel, > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:57:23AM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we are checking a huge pull request #177 (https://github.com/pharo- > project/ > > pharo/pull/177) that will change some basics of the bootstrap process: > > > > ... > > > > So please, try to look at the PR and test the resultant image [1] to > avoid some > > major problems. > > > > [1] https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/7.0/job/70-PR-Check-Load/ > lastSuccessfulBuild > > /artifact/bootstrap-cache/Pharo7.0-32bit-9c0691d.zip > > This image had gone by the time I tried to download it, however the same > directory contained Pharo7.0-32bit-58e8755. > > > There were some fixing commits to the PR so the build hash changed. The > original download link should contain build number, not symbolic > lastSuccessfulBuild. Sorry for troubles.
Thanks for the clarification. The main point of my message was that I was able to do some successfull testing (as requested), and which version was tested. :-) Cheers, Alistair > I did some ad hoc testing with my current Pharo 7 code and it worked > without any problems. (but this is only a small test) > > P.S. It would be great if the archive name included something that would > allow us to easily guess which is a newer version, e.g. > > git rev-list --count HEAD > > > Thanks, > Alistair
