> On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:14, Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:06, Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:49:02AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>>>> I think there is a consensus we need to keep #cr and #lf as intended,
>>>> yet to add some kind of #newLine (which btw is different to EOL :P)
>>>> vocabulary, isn???t?
>>>> 
>>>> In this, I favour Peter approach for define line ending convention
>>>> (the way #newLine will work)??? and of course by default it should use
>>>> the one from the current platform. 
>>>> 
>>>> anything agains this approach?
>>>> 
>>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> I prefer #nl to #newLine, but admit that it is a subjective preference
>>> and that descriptive names are generally better.
>> 
>> heh, me too... but is a bit cryptic.
> 
> 
> #nl
>    "Insert the platform dependent end of line character.
>    For people that haven't got used to terminal communications rising
>    above 9600baud"
> 
>    ^self newLine

+1

> 
> 
> 
> :-)

Reply via email to