Hi Nicolas,

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 10:10:02PM +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> Yes, that's a problem.
> Some projetcs have a strict policy and remove old versions (for example 
> because
> they have vulnerabilities).
> So we have to regularly update our upstream links.
> But we have caches on Travis/Appveyor because reconstructing those external
> dependencies is very costly
> (see the cache directive near line 7 of https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/
> opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/.travis.yml).
> Consequently, a green build on the CI server might well be red anywhere 
> else...
> 
> Nicolas

Thanks for the clarification, I guessed that something like this might
be happening.

I've opened issue #20341:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20341/

Pull request to follow...

Cheers,
Alistair


> 2017-08-26 20:51 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant <[email protected]>:
> 
>     Hi Stef,
> 
>     On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 07:59:09PM +0200, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>     > Indeed.
>     > Tx alistair.
> 
>     This is a little terse for me to be sure of your meaning, but I'll take
>     it to mean I should submit the patch. :-)
> 
>     BTW: I tested libpng-1.6.30 on the full test suite, and the set of
>     failing tests was the same.
> 
> 
>     Cheers,
>     Alistair
> 
> 
> 
>     > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Alistair Grant <[email protected]>
>     wrote:
>     > > Hi All, Esteban,
>     > >
>     > > I just attempted to build the pharo vm on Win32 and it failed due to:
>     > >
>     > > ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/libpng/png/src/libpng16/
>     libpng-1.6.29.tar.gz
>     > >
>     > > not being available.  The current version is 1.6.30, which also 
> appears
>     > > to be unavailable from this address.
>     > >
>     > > I successfully downloaded 1.6.29 from:
>     > >
>     > > 
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/libpng/libpng-1.6.29.tar.gz?download
>     > >
>     > > which is referenced on what appears to be the official web page:
>     > >
>     > > http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html
>     > >
>     > > I plan to test with 1.6.30 tonight.
>     > >
>     > > Is there any reason not to submit a PR pointing to sourceforge?
>     > >
>     > > Thanks,
>     > > Alistair
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to