> On 9 Sep 2017, at 15:45, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> STON cannot serialise block closures. > > Oops, sorry. I see that now: > https://github.com/svenvc/ston/blob/master/ston-paper.md#limitations > > I wonder, in this case, there are no references in the block to any objects > except its own arguments. Would it be possible to support that limited case? > (I don't need it for myself, just pondering out loud)
Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines, especially clean block might be doable. I'll mark this as todo and think about it a bit.
