On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:36 AM, stephan <step...@stack.nl> wrote:

> On 11-09-17 11:18, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, stephan <step...@stack.nl <mailto:
>> step...@stack.nl>> wrote:
>>
>>     This looks like it is missing directories.
>>     On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories
>>     might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable.
>>     http://files.pharo.org/image/70/ <http://files.pharo.org/image/70/>
>>
>>
>> Yeh, also so far people will use mostly the latest minimal and full
>> images. All intermediate steps are stored just because we can.
>>
>> But if you have some idea/proposal on how to enhance it, we could do it
>>
>
> Indeed, I also assume most people will be looking for either the minimal
> or the full image, in either 32 or 64 bit. Would it be better to add a
> subdirectory for the (intermediary) build steps?


What and where we upload is in here:

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/blob/development/bootstrap/scripts/upload_to_files.pharo.org.sh


>
>
> Stephan
>
>
>


-- 



Guille Polito


Research Engineer

French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr*
<http://www.cnrs.fr>



*Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>

*Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13

Reply via email to