In my tests, at the moment. Only there. I derived the ParrotTalk-3.5 spec from eright’s.org’s ELib implementation.
Do you think I should change the spec to allow for free, anonymous connections? - HH On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:52, Stephane Ducasse <[[email protected]]("mailto:[email protected]";)> wrote: > Hi henry thanks for this announce. Can you tell where such protocols are > used? Stef On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:33 PM, henry wrote: > Hi all, > > I am > happy to announce the release of version 3.5 of ParrotTalk, for Squeak > and > Pharo, found here: > > > http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ParrotTalk-zzz.2.mcz > > It follows > this specification: > > https://github.com/ZiroZimbarra/callistohouse/blob/master/docs/ParrotTalkFrameDesign-3.5.pdf > > > One item of note, in version 3.5, the system connecting to a server, > sending > the IWant msg, must know the vatId of the system being connected > to. I am > considering changing this to version 3.6 by removing one > round-trip in > messaging. Therefore, these messages would be combined: > IWant/GiveInfo, > IAm/ReplyInfo. I will keep ProtocolOffered and > ProtocolAccepted to allow > eLindaSession to support both versions: 3.5 and > 3.6. > > Thoughts please? > > - HH @callistohouse.club>
