Thank's Nicolas for answers. I have same vision. 2017-11-05 15:47 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier < [email protected]>:
> > > SortByPropertyFunction -> shouldn’t be “PropertySortFunction” ? (coherent >> with the previous one) >> > > +1 for PropertySortFunction, or maybe just PropertySorter > > 3) Function refers to SortFunction. > For this, I'm neutral, whether you call it Sorter or SortFunction I don't > care. > SortFunction kind of implies these are stateless, so it's a rather good > and accurate name. > Maybe a Sorter could be more confusing, because a Sorter could be thought > as having the sorted collection as instance variable (statefull). > Agree, I prefer SortFunction name instead of Sorter. > > Nicolas > > >> Esteban >> >> > >> > Stef >> > >> >> >> >
