2017-11-07 13:11 GMT+01:00 Thierry Goubier <[email protected]>:
> > Now, if you explained me something like that: > > people nilFirst ascending > > Then I'd be more convinced. Or even > > people sorted nilFirst ascending (if one would prefer restricting the > implementations of #nilFirst). > I think we can easily support it. But of course it will work only for objects which understand #threeWayCompareTo:. Now it looks like #(one nil two) sorted: #yourself ascending undefinedFirst. And I prefer this version instead of extending collection with new sorting messages.
