>
> #sizeInMemory only takes into account object header size and the size of the
> object
> itself.
>
> sizeInMemory is also ignorant of details such as the padding of objects to
> 64-bits in both 32-bit and 64-bit Spur, the overflow header when there are
> more than 254 slots, etc. siseInMemory should really be implemented like
> this:
>
Thanks, I added an issue tracker entry:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20663/improve-sizeInMemory
<https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20663/improve-sizeInMemory>
Marcus
