>> > > Then should not we replace STON based class definition with actual smalltalk > based definition? Tonel could parse class definition in similar way like it > parses methods.
Probably not :) but one of this day we will change the class definition in Pharo adn we do not really want to impact tonel. For me tonel is a storage format and it is ok like that. Using Strings will solve the glitches. Stef
