Yes your second scenario looks cool to me :). Keep us informed because this is really exciting.
Stef On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:13 PM, despotadesdibujau <despotadesdibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>Hi Gabriel > >>This is cool. >>Thanks for sharing it with us. >>I really want an object responsible for deploying an app. :) >>Your effort is nice in that directory. Keep pushing > >>Stef > Thanks!!! > > Maxi Tabacman suggests me to reify the deployment process. > I thought of something like to get up a minimal image from inside the > development image, then to start the deployment process from the development > image. > I suppose that I would need to use Espell Object Spaces (Guillermo Polito), > but in this case, I would need a special virtual machine (Oz Virtual > Machine)... Something like Tornado, but not using the "Run Fail Grow" > approach, but using a BaselineOf or ConfigurationOf approach. > Another idea (simpler than the idea above) is to communicate the two images > using Teapot or Sockets: The Development image sends orders to the minimal > image until it becomes on the deployment image. > > For the moment I need to test the process (on Pharo 6 and 7) using more > complex applications until it becomes a reliable process. > > Gabriel > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >
