Sorry, I’m not sure what I’ve read but it does not seem to be the mail of Pavel 
:)

Norbert


> Am 12.12.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>:
> 
> For me split methods operate on separators which are not included in the 
> result. So name it splitXXX might not be the best idea. And I think it should 
> be more explicit. When the matching elements are included in the result it 
> needs to indicate where the are added. So it is rather something like 
> 
> xxxAfter: 
> 
> because the collection is separated after the matching element. What the 
> method does is oppositional to flattenXXX. So if we would have the opposite 
> term of flatten that might be a good candidate. Then it would be something 
> like
> 
> roughenAfter:
> 
> :) Ok, stupid name but you got the idea.
> 
> Norbert
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 12.12.2017 um 10:50 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> #splitWhile: because the block does not define separators but its value 
>> indicates runs ?
>> 
>>> On 12 Dec 2017, at 10:34, Thomas Dupriez 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> #(1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 6 ) splitWhen:  [ :each | each = 4]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 12/12/2017 à 10:23, Pavel Krivanek a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> do you have some proposals for a better name for the message named 
>>>> #aggregateRuns?
>>>> 
>>>> (#(1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 6 ) aggregateRuns:  [ :each | each = 4])
>>>>>>> #(#(1 2 3) #(4) #(1 2 3 5 6)).
>>>> 
>>>> (#(1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 ) aggregateRuns:  [ :each | each = 4])
>>>>>>> #(#(1 2 3) #(4) #(1 2 3) #(4) #(5 6)).
>>>> 
>>>> ((1 to: 12) aggregateRuns:  [ :each | (each \\ 3) = 0])
>>>>>>> #(#(1 2) #(3) #(4 5) #(6) #(7 8) #(9) #(10 11) #(12)).
>>>> 
>>>> The current comment is:
>>>> "Answer a new collection of the same species as the
>>>> receiver with elements being collections (of the receiver
>>>> species) containing those elements of the receiver
>>>> for which the given block consecutively evaluates to
>>>> the same object."
>>>> 
>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20864/add-examples-to-SequenceableCollection-aggregateRuns
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -- Pavel
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to