Hi, just to not mistake my intentions :) I don't care WHO removed the retry or WHO fixed it. I care about the WHY.
If the WHY is not clear nor documented, we risk to make the mistake again. Please, let all of us be strict on the issue reports we do, and even stricter on ourselves. We need to raise the quality bar, not move it down! And regarding this particular issue, I'd like to raise a warning. Let's not fix symptoms, fix causes. If we fix the symptom, the problem is still there. And moreover, if we fix the symptom and we lose track of it, we may forget unless somebody realizes weeks afterwards and it is too late (not this case fortunately). On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > tx them too. > This is great to be surrounded by all you guys! > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The UI Manager problem was fixed by Pablo and Guille >> >> -- Pavel >> >> 2017-12-16 13:06 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >> >>> tx pavel >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Krivanek < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The problems were related UIManager initialization and consequences of >>>> the opening of the Welcome window. >>>> >>>> -- Pavel >>>> >>>> 2017-12-16 9:12 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Pavel what was the problem? >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Pavel Krivanek < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The variable value was reverted to the original value. Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Pavel >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-12-12 20:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, with Marcus we decreased the retryTimes variable two weeks ago >>>>>>> to 1 because in that time the validations were in really bad shape and >>>>>>> literally every validation failed on some random issue and the retries >>>>>>> caused enormous build times. It was producing more troubles than >>>>>>> profit. It >>>>>>> probably can be reverted now because the main problem of the validation >>>>>>> instability was suppressed. I will prepare a PR. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-12-12 18:52 GMT+01:00 Guillermo Polito < >>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see that we are retrying tests only once, which is causing most >>>>>>>> (if not all) pull requests to fail sporadically... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe it got lost because of a mistake? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also, I'd like that changes in the build process are discussed in >>>>>>>> the mailing list from time to time... I've put a lot of effort into >>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>> it work and if we have regressions I'd like to understand them... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Guille >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Guille Polito >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Research Engineer >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CRIStAL - UMR 9189 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr >>>>>>>> <http://www.cnrs.fr>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 <+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr <http://www.cnrs.fr>* *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
