No, I do not mean changing of the prefix. Class will just say that it has
prefix JS and it these letters will be displayed with a different color or
something like that.

-- Pavel

2017-12-21 10:33 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]>:

> This is not the same. Lets assume you have a class JSObject with a class
> side method:
>
>   toolPrefix
>      ^'JS' -> 'JavaScript'
>
> providing such info for the tools and you use that to display it in the
> browser as
>
>   JavaScript::Object
>
> But still in the methods I would have to write JSObject in the code.
> Which would be more confusing and useless then ...
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2017 um 08:25 Uhr
> Von: "Pavel Krivanek" <[email protected]>
> An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] :: Separator in class names
>
> Actually I think we do not need any change in the language syntax. Classes
> can provide information about their prefix and tools can take it into
> account during displaying it in the lists or code.
>
> -- Pavel
>
> 2017-12-21 0:35 GMT+01:00 Torsten Bergmann <[email protected][mailto:astares
> @gmx.de]>:Remember this December thread from 2016:
>
>   http://forum.world.st/Separator-in-class-names-
> td4926162.html[http://forum.world.st/Separator-in-class-
> names-td4926162.html]
>
> There is no need for a full blown namespace solution with scoping,
> imports, ....
>
> Only for allowing a separator in class names.
>
> Within this thread I wrote:
>
> >Not many of you answered this thread in 2016. Maybe
> >I have more luck in 2017 ;)
>
> Looks like one year passed and there was no luck with it.
>
> Any chance for 2018? ;)
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>
>

Reply via email to