Let us make clear what I think! What I mean is that we are losing OUR/MY time maintaining information for versions that we cannot even run and the information is all the time obsolete. Because let us face it with the millions different configurations what is the probability that it will be up to date? Each time I have students, this information is obsolete or not working on their specific version.
Don't you all think that Marcus could concentrate better on making a pass on Opal if he would not have to split his time into many small details? So if you want to help then perfect. I think that having a travis job and extracting the information from the job would be a lot better process. Like a test and a method comment. **EXECUTABLE** and **TESTED**. Stef On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > I have done all the changes last week. > >> On 21 Dec 2017, at 21:17, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Someone install and using Pharo on Linux should maintain this page. >> I would simply remove it because this is just a pain to maintain a >> description for system that we cannot even >> use. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Can we change linux installation instructions on the web site? I can't >>> believe they aren't there, yet. Here is the description. >>> >>> http://forum.world.st/Latest-Debian-Ubuntu-and-CentOS-packages-of-the-pharo-vm-td4962000.html >>> >>> This describes what to do for some linux distributions not only ubuntu. In >>> the mail there are opensuse URLs. The all contain the word "latest" which >>> means the development version. If this is exchanged with "stable" you get >>> the stable version. The rest stays the same. >>> >>> I really should have checked this. Because it is just stupid that people >>> spend a lot of work into that and it is not used nor published. >>> >>> If I can help please say so!!!! >>> >>> Norbert >>> >> > >
