> On 6 Jan 2018, at 20:08, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On 6 January 2018 at 12:09, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It great having a CI system to check all our tests a passing,
>> but I thought I'd go old school and run them from the TestRunner GUI
>> and found in a fresh latest Pharo 7 there are "128 failures, 63 errors"
>> 
>> This one is interesting...
>> ArrayTest>>test0FixtureAsSetForIdentityMultiplinessTest
>> | anElement res |
>> self elementsCopyNonIdenticalWithoutEqualElements.
>> anElement := self elementsCopyNonIdenticalWithoutEqualElements anyOne.
>> self deny: anElement copy == anElement.  "<<<<FAILS"
>> 
>> where anElement ==> SmallFloat64 (1.5)
>> so the deny fails.
> 
> Which platform and image?
> 
> Pharo 7.0
> Build information:
> Pharo-7.0+alpha.build.410.sha.aa40385cd6fee69bb51d4a3afcacfb5f91eed206
> (32 Bit)
> Ubuntu 16.04
> 
> 14915 run, 14859 passes, 31 skipped, 50 expected failures, 5 failures,
> 1 errors, 0 unexpected passes
> Failures:
> ReleaseTest>>#testMethodsWithUnboundGlobals
> TonelWriterTest>>#testWriteSnapshot
> ReleaseTest>>#testUnpackagedClasses
> ReleaseTest>>#testNoEmptyPackages
> ReleaseTest>>#testThatAllMethodsArePackaged
> 
> Errors:
> ZnClientTests>>#testRedirect

Hmm, strange. Does it failed each time ?

It does not fail for me (macOS). Furthermore, all Zinc tests are green 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/ZincHTTPComponents/

> Cheers,
> Alistair
> 
> 
> 
>> It seems that the test setUp is wrong since
>> #elementsCopyNonIdenticalWithoutEqualElements
>> does not return a collection (of elements for which copy is not identical )
>> without equal elements:"
>> 
>> This seems like a permanent error rather than a transient one.
>> How does this slip through CI testing?
>> and what can be done about cleaning this up?
>> 
>> cheers -ben
>> 
>> P.S. With the loss of method version info is impossible to guess when this
>> may have been introduced, to guess which Issue it was related to, to guess
>> how I might approach fixing this myself.


Reply via email to