--- Begin Message ---Historically, it's always been 'initalize-release' ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)From: Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> To: Pharo Dev <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 6:33 AM Subject: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names convention I’m not the biggest fan of method categories/protocols but I try to. What strikes me is the huge mess in names we have. Everytime I create e.g. an initialize method I’m asking myself which is the proper name to choose initialize initializing initialization …. Do we have a convention for this? Right now all names starting with init are initialization-data initialize-destroy initialization-filter initialize - release initialize initialization-union initialize - event initializing initialization initalize-release initailize-release initialization widgets initalize initialize-release initialization-release Norbert
--- End Message ---
Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names convention
Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev Sat, 13 Jan 2018 03:36:42 -0800
- [Pharo-dev] Protocol names convention Norbert Hartl
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names conventio... Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names conventio... Eliot Miranda
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names conve... Alistair Grant
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names c... Norbert Hartl
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol nam... Cyril Ferlicot D.
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protoco... Alistair Grant
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Pro... Stephane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names c... Stephane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Protocol names conventio... Stephane Ducasse
