> On 31 Mar 2018, at 17:17, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote: > > What does this means for end users?
nothing. we are removing some *users* of glamour. Not glamour itself and certainly not the gttools that use glamour intensively (and they allow easy extension). > > I use Glamour extensively... does it mean that I will have to abandon all > that code, or just that I need to load Glamour explicitly? Glamour is not leaving the image! cheers, Esteban ps: but there are leaks around we would like to discover how and when they happen (because they are not so many and not evident). Any help there is welcome :) > > Thanks, > Peter > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Iceberg :) > And all the user of Glamour that are not GT. > > Stef > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Peter Uhnák <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Since Glamour is not really maintained anymore and source of some > >> leaks and problems, we want to remove any users > >> except GTTools. > > > > > > Can you please provide more info on this? What exactly is going to be > > removed? > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > >
