Hi 2018-04-22 17:19 GMT+02:00 Hilaire <[email protected]>:
> Denis, > > Here is my experience on that: > > 1. I did not expect the trait user radio button, so I did not look at it. > > 2. However I request the contextual menu over the trait and expect > something to see its users, and I get the menu entry "Class ref.", and went > there. > > Other user opinion may be needed, but from my POV 1. is uneeded, 2. "Class > ref." should be replaced by "Users". > Traits are normal classes. They can be used directly in code. It is not common practice but I saw such code. But I am wondering that extra radio button is not intuitive solution for you. It is placed nearly Flat/Hier options because it is another kind of class relationship. To me it is consistent to access it in same way like "class->superclass" relationship. And there is another option "Traits" for classes which uses traits. And notice that we do not show subclasses of class in the result of "Class refs" query. > > It will make your UI more consistent and predictable to the end user. > > Hilaire > > > Le 22/04/2018 à 12:45, Denis Kudriashov a écrit : > >> Hi. >> >> When you select trait new hierarchy mode appears: trait users. >> >> > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu > > > >
