> On Jun 19, 2018, at 2:50 AM, Christophe Demarey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Le 17 juin 2018 à 20:20, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Also, it seems that "higher" priority in SessionManager means a lower >> number! This seems opposite of both logic and precedent (see Process), no? > > You’re right. It simplifies sorting but indeed is counter-intuitive. > Changing that now will probably break things for people relying on the > current behavior.
I guess it seems intuitive to me that 1st place is higher priority than 2nd place or that 1 comes before 2. But you could add a new API with a number that gets translated to/from an internal value. That is the beauty of encapsulation. James Foster
