The problem is, there isn't really an order to preserve in the first place, since even if the original collection is a sequencable one, the elements of each group would be interleaved in it. I could see the point of sorting the keys though.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 18:32, Petr Fischer via Pharo-dev < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, I found a useful method in the collection - groupedBy: - the result > container is some PlugableDictionary (integer variant) and group order > (keys) is not preserved. > > Would not it be better to choose some other Dictionary variant, which > preserve the order of groups (like in source Collection)? > > pf > > -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
