IntelliJ search everywhere is shift shift.

Kind of neat as well.

Phil

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 13:34 Ben Coman <[email protected] wrote:

> Not really sure if this is a good idea, but why not share...
>
> How about Shift-Enter-Enter.  Kind of like a double click.
> Because "local" is kind of like going deeper, kind of like entering a
> house and then entering a room, kind of like entering twice.
>
> Yeah, I know.... a lot of "kind of like"s
> cheers -ben
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 20:11, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6 Nov 2018, at 12:58, Esteban Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> If Shift+Enter opens Spotter, why not use Cmd+Shift+Enter for the
>> contextual one?
>>
>>
>> Because it does not works (already tried) :)
>>
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>> So the canonical shortcut is Shift+Enter and there is a modifier to open
>> it contextualized, could be Cmd/Ctrl or Meta/Win.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>>
>>
>> El mar., 6 nov. 2018 a las 7:56, Esteban Lorenzano (<[email protected]>)
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Most of you don’t know it, but Calypso incorporates an option to show a
>>> “contextual spotter” which will list all available commands in the context
>>> you selected.
>>> This is meant to help on discoverability and reachability of commands
>>> available.
>>>
>>> This is *in addition to shortcuts* not a replace of them (but lets be
>>> honest, we have far more commands than those that are possible to handle
>>> with a simple shortcut).
>>>
>>> Anyway, originally I mapped this command to meta+/, which fitted well
>>> with my keyboard and language, but seems is not the case for many others
>>> (and this is not working at all on windows).
>>>
>>> So. I’m looking for options :)
>>>
>>> So far I have this two ideas:
>>>
>>> 1- alt+enter
>>> 2- meta+h
>>>
>>> First one looks nice, but I’m not sure it will work on all
>>> platforms/combinations. What do you think?
>>>
>>> Esteban
>>>
>>> Ps: I will also add an icon somewhere to expose the contextual spotter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to