Hi,
Would something like this work:
spec for: #'pharo6.0.x' do: [
spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib' with: [
spec
file: 'Smallapack-StdLib.UFFI-nice.1']
]
Or maybe in the baseline you can have:
spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib' with: [
spec
file: 'Smallapack-StdLib.UFFI-nice']
]
Cheers,
Andrei
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:19 PM Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to resolve a dialect compatibility problem like this:
>
> I want to load the Squeak and Pharo3 to 5 version depending on FFI
> Smallapack-StdLib-nice.1
>
> For Pharo6, I made a different branch depending on UFFI
> Smallapack-StdLib.UFFI-nice.1
>
> In the base line, i tell
> spec for: #'common' do: [
> spec blessing: #'baseline'.
> spec repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/Smallapack'.
> spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib']
> and in the version I tell
>
> spec for: #squeak do: [
> spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib' with:
> 'Smallapack-StdLib-nice.1'].
> spec for: #'pharo5.0.x' do: [
> spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib' with:
> 'Smallapack-StdLib-nice.1'].
> spec for: #'pharo6.0.x' do: [
> spec package: 'Smallapack-StdLib' with:
> 'Smallapack-StdLib.UFFI-nice.1'].
>
> but the configuration loads Smallapack-StdLib-nice.1 instead of
> Smallapack-StdLib.UFFI-nice.1
>
> I would like to avoid using two different package names because it
> complexifies the baseline for nothing.
> It the same package, just a different branch.
> Isn't it possible?
> Why?
> Can we fix it?
>
