> > Ok. > > So Iceberg will not try to wrap other modes of conversion and versioning like > STON
STON is not for versioning code. But objects. > and Monticello to provide a kind of seamless LCD approach and some backward > compatibility with Monticello (without encouraging new use of Monticello)? No because the distance is too large. We cannot burn our two engineers on “nice to have” when the “must have” is not yet done. Now migrating to iceberg is super easy and configurations are a lot simpler than with monticello. Stef > > > Shaping
