I'm also interested in discussing about the meta object protocol. Maybe we can coordinate something during the ESUG?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019, 13:04 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Norbert, I share the point of improving the implementation to reuse the > anonymous classes. > I will check that and propose a solution, of course if any one else want > to propose something is welcomed. > > Thinking about the reflective messages I don't have a stablished opinion. > I think the behaviour should be the most similar to the one of traits, and > avoiding custom messages. So, what I am saying that I am tempted to review > all the api (classes, traits, talents... What ever somebody invents). I > would love to get more opinions > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 16:51 Sean P. DeNigris, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> NorbertHartl wrote >> > I’m playing again with Talents and I want that in Pharo8 to appear so it >> > can mature. >> >> I'm very interested in this. Adding behavior at runtime only when an >> object >> takes on a role seems to have many possibilities e.g. expressiveness and >> code simplification. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> >>
