> On 17 Aug 2019, at 12:50, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
> 
> hi Stef,  
> I feel you missed my point. Probably I wasn't clear this has already been 
> tested with latest Pharo 8 launched by PharoLauncher.  
> The problem occurs with Pharo 7.0.3(64 bit) and with 
> Pharo8.0-SNAPSHOT-build.635(64 bit) 
> after Microsoft Windows Update 1903...
> https://www.computerworld.com/article/3409621/microsoft-starts-windows-10s-1803-to-1903-forced-upgrade.html
>  
> <https://www.computerworld.com/article/3409621/microsoft-starts-windows-10s-1803-to-1903-forced-upgrade.html>
>   
> 
> If indeed 1903 is the cause, with this update now being *forced* down on 
> people, this will potentially soon impact more and more Windows users.
> But my guess that 1903 is the culprit needs to be confirmed.  
> So I am requesting someone with access to multiple Windows machines directly 
> compare a 1903 machine with a pre-1903 machine. 

indeed I misunderstood you :)
> 
> cheers -ben
> 
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 12:58, ducasse <steph...@netcourrier.com 
> <mailto:steph...@netcourrier.com>> wrote:
> Hi ben 
> 
> in the pharo launcher if you click on P8.0 (development version) you get 
> access to all the builds. 
> 
> Stef
> 
>> On 16 Aug 2019, at 16:02, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com 
>> <mailto:b...@openinworld.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> IThis morning the May 2019 Windows Update "1903" forced itself onto my 
>> computer and now 64-bits Pharo seems to have a problem with 
>> git_remote_fetch() FFI callout.  I no longer have a non-1903 machine to 
>> directly compare behaviour before "1903".  Can someone familiar with this 
>> area with both "pre-1903" and "1903" machines triage whether "1903" is 
>> indeed the cause?
>> 
>> A few other recent reports are noted here...
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3418 
>> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3418>  
>> 
>> cheers -ben
> 

Reply via email to