> On 8 Sep 2019, at 18:30, ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I’m thinking that I should subclass RBMessageNode to have 
> RBSlotInitializationNode

So now I’m creating RBSlotInitializationNode as a subclass of the superclass of 
MessageNode because it felt too much as a bad subclassing practice.

> 
> Ideally I have the impression that it would be nice to have 
> RBNoReceiverMessageNode as a subclass or RBMessageNode. 
> This way we could also simplify the logic of cascade :) - but this is another 
> story. 
> 
> Stef
> 



Reply via email to