> On 27 Nov 2019, at 14:05, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 6:29 PM ducasse <steph...@netcourrier.com> wrote:
>>
>> Cyril
>>
>> We are crawling with too many things.
>> Pharo should start to lose fat FOR REAL.
>> I really hope that we will get rid of lot of old code in the future.
>> If Enlumineur does not work when we integrate it - I just issue a PR
>> then you will have a good case for reintegrating and having two formatter,
>> two contexts classes,
>> two packages full of nearly the same but not quite tests.
>>
>
> Yes but deprecation give us time to migrate.
>
> Now I cannot work on Moose because the dev version is broken since
> Roassal depends on GTEventRecorder and it was removed without
> deprecation.
>
> It's the second day in a row where I cannot work properly. And I don't
> know when Moose will be fixed because I don't know the code of roassal
> and I cannot fix it myself. So I have to wait that someone else fixes
> it.
>
> I understand that we want Pharo to be smaller but here it prevent
> people from working. And the size of those projects is nothing
> compared to the global size of Pharo and we are assured to be able to
> remove them just after the release of Pharo 8.
>
>> S.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cyril Ferlicot
> https://ferlicot.fr
Yes, this could have been handled much better, I guess (I don't know the
details).
But for day to day work, you have to use Pharo 7, which should be 100% stable,
while Pharo 8 is a moving target, an alpha version that is sometimes broken.
Now, we still want users for Pharo 8, else there will be no feedback, so there
are certainly two sides to this argument.
Sven
