> > > > In a farther future, a higher performance > > version of the Woden Engine will be made by using Sysmel, mostly because > > it > > seems to be much easier to support real multi-threading in Sysmel by > > making > > a completely new system. > > Congrats! But... sad that Pharo may eventually lose Woden. Is there no > other > way? E.g. optimizing? Also, do you think "yet another programming language" > to learn will discourage a wide audience for Woden?
Well, the alternative is C++ which is a lot of worse. But Pharo will keep being the scripting language for Woden, but probably a much more minimalistic and "embedded" version of Pharo in the long term. I am designing Sysmel in a way so it is easy to compile standard Pharo code into the Sysmel run time. El jue., 9 ene. 2020 a las 17:18, Sean P. DeNigris (<s...@clipperadams.com>) escribió: > Ronie Salgado wrote > > In a farther future, a higher performance > > version of the Woden Engine will be made by using Sysmel, mostly because > > it > > seems to be much easier to support real multi-threading in Sysmel by > > making > > a completely new system. > > Congrats! But... sad that Pharo may eventually lose Woden. Is there no > other > way? E.g. optimizing? Also, do you think "yet another programming language" > to learn will discourage a wide audience for Woden? > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > >