>
>
> > In a farther future, a higher performance
> > version of the Woden Engine will be made by using Sysmel, mostly because
> > it
> > seems to be much easier to support real multi-threading in Sysmel by
> > making
> > a completely new system.
>
> Congrats! But... sad that Pharo may eventually lose Woden. Is there no
> other
> way? E.g. optimizing? Also, do you think "yet another programming language"
> to learn will discourage a wide audience for Woden?

Well, the alternative is C++ which is a lot of worse. But Pharo will keep
being the scripting language for Woden, but probably a much more
minimalistic and "embedded" version of Pharo in the long term. I am
designing Sysmel in a way so it is easy to compile standard Pharo code into
the Sysmel run time.


El jue., 9 ene. 2020 a las 17:18, Sean P. DeNigris (<s...@clipperadams.com>)
escribió:

> Ronie Salgado wrote
> > In a farther future, a higher performance
> > version of the Woden Engine will be made by using Sysmel, mostly because
> > it
> > seems to be much easier to support real multi-threading in Sysmel by
> > making
> > a completely new system.
>
> Congrats! But... sad that Pharo may eventually lose Woden. Is there no
> other
> way? E.g. optimizing? Also, do you think "yet another programming language"
> to learn will discourage a wide audience for Woden?
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
>
>

Reply via email to