Hi
I’m fed up. Why?
Because I see lousy code in Pharo and that such lousy code in Pharo is slower,
and sure that writing a type inferencer
for pharo will be more complex, and probably will make sista more complex too.
I asked the pharo consortium to take a clear position because I want a better
Pharo not the inverse.
So what is it.
You can write in your code but not in Pharo.
aCol do: #store
in Pharo we should write
aCol do: [ :each | each store ]
Block argument should be blocks else any static analyser will have to check it
is a block, it is a symbol, is
it a RANDOM object that answer value.
Seriously can be not make the life of people doing program analysis simpler?
So now if I’m wrong then I will shut up and I’m really pissed that we do that
without paying attention
to the consequence.
I asked the consortium to take position and to take action.
We should have a better code review for REAL.
S.
