Hi Doru, thanks for checking this behavior. Those methods are not correctly packaged because those are methods added from a trait. Nowadays, #methods returns all the methods in the class (the ones defined in the class and the ones defined in the used traits) and #localMethods returns the methods defined only in the class.
I think it is a good issue to open so we can discuss which is the best API for it. Maybe the existing one is not good. To me, #methods should not return all the methods from the method dictionary or we have to encourage to use the #localMethods where #methods is used. I am not sure about what is the answer, so the issue to discuss will be perfect. Cheers, Pablo On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 8:16 AM Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > While trying to measure the size of code, I stumbled across an interesting > problem: it seems that some methods have a package, but the package does not > list. > > packagedMethods := RPackageOrganizer default packages flatCollect: #methods. > methods := ProtoObject withAllSubclasses flatCollect: #methods. > diff := methods \ packagedMethods. > diff size. > “7249" > > Looking at bit closer, it looks like the methods do have a package and that > they point to the package that is in the package organizer, so that is good: > > diff select: [ :each | each package isNil ] > "an OrderedCollection()". > > diff select: [ :each | (RPackageOrganizer default packages includes: each > package) not ]. > "an OrderedCollection()” > > However, when we ask the package, it does not know about the method: > > diff select: [ :each | each package methods includes: each ] > "an OrderedCollection()” > > > Is this a known problem or should I open an issue (I did not find a bug > report for it)? > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > feenk.com > > "Presenting is storytelling." > > -- Pablo Tesone. teso...@gmail.com
