Esteban Lorenzano wrote
> The class comments are not clear?

Maybe it's me ;-)


Esteban Lorenzano wrote
> Opaque object = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opaque_data_type
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opaque_data_type>
> External object = a pointer to something. 

For example, why is ObjCClass a subclass of FFIExternalObject instead of
FFIOpaqueObject when the docs say that a "Class [is] An opaque type that
represents an Objective-C class"? Also, is the distinction just conceptual?
I don't see what either class "buys" you in behavior since they are siblings
that both pretty much have no methods.



-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Reply via email to