I changed the event handling in osx and windows, Linux uses the same old
code, but I don't discard there is a bug there or elsewhere 😁

I have been following this issue, I have it in my list. I have just started
with the easier ones.

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 13:37 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Pablo,
>
> Thank you, I will test this soon.
>
> Is there any chance that there were also network changes in the Linux VM ?
> Perhaps also related to "detecting exceptions and out-of-band data".
>
> We keep on struggling with
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/9565 where it seems that
> the same code runs fine on Pharo 7 and 8, while it seems to fail on Pharo 9.
>
> Sven
>
> > On 21 Jul 2021, at 13:06, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > I have done a new release with the fix for the socket connection.
> > It was an issue in the kqueue code in OSX.
> > It was wrongly detecting exceptions and out-of-band data.
> > Please if you can update the VM and test it should be working.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Pablo
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:13 PM Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > yes - Sven is right on that it could be improved. Thanks for taking
> > care of this important topic.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Torsten
> >
> >
> > Gesendet: Montag, 19. Juli 2021 um 11:46 Uhr
> > Von: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: [Pharo-dev] Re:
> [Zdc]SocketStream>>#openConnectionToHostNamed:port: no longer signals am
> exception on macOS
> > Thanks, yes it is true, the version name is a mess.
> > We need to improve the version display.
> > I will take note of that and I will fix it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pablo
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:08 AM Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > prometheus:2021-07-16 sven$ ./pharo --version
> > Pharo 9.0.0 built on Jul  6 2021 10:36:56 Compiler: 4.2.1 Compatible
> Apple LLVM 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.29)
> > Built from: ea8a3bfc - Commit: ea8a3bfc - Date: 2021-07-06 10:23:13 +0200
> > prometheus:2021-07-16 sven$ ./pharo Pharo.image printVersion
> > [version] 'Pharo9.0.0'
> 'Pharo-9.0.0+build.1532.sha.e58ef49051bf06cad56a2dda174b8e091a45d5df (64
> Bit)'
> > prometheus:2021-07-16 sven$ ./pharo Pharo.image eval "(ZdcSocketStream
> openConnectionToHostNamed: 'localhost' port: 12335) nextPut: 0; close. #foo"
> >
> > I have said this before, but the VM version is incomprehensible for
> normal people, why can't it just be something like 10.1 like the rest of
> the world ?
> >
> > Also, for mere mortals it is impossible to find out if something changed
> about the VM, let alone what, and how that all relates to specific versions.
> >
> > I know that you guys have a lot of work, and we are very grateful for
> it, but this is how it looks from the outside.
> >
> > Thx,
> >
> > Sven
> >
> > > On 19 Jul 2021, at 10:56, [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >    with the new VM I could not reproduce it. I think it was related
> with the issue of the NetNameResolver.
> > > Which VM version are you using?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 3:51 PM Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It seems that the following consistently crashes a recent/latest Pharo
> 9 image/vm on macOS:
> > >
> > >   (ZdcSocketStream openConnectionToHostNamed: 'localhost' port: 12335)
> nextPut: 0; close.
> > >
> > > Command line, you can try it as follows:
> > >
> > >  $ ./pharo Pharo.image eval "(ZdcSocketStream
> openConnectionToHostNamed: 'localhost' port: 12335) nextPut: 0; close. #foo"
> > >
> > > You can replace ZdcSocketStream by SocketStream, same result.
> > >
> > > Before, trying to connect to a non-existing host:port resulted in a
> ConnectionTimedOut: Cannot connect to 127.0.0.1:12335.
> > >
> > > Now, the code just returns and the bad stream is then used as if it is
> OK, which results in a hard crash.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, there is no backtrace nor log.
> > >
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pablo Tesone.
> > > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pablo Tesone.
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pablo Tesone.
> > [email protected]
>

Reply via email to