> Am 05.12.2024 um 14:04 schrieb Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> 
>> Le 5 déc. 2024 à 1:49 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> a 
>> écrit :
>> 
>> 
>>> Just to be sure. In that case it would be nice to have a way to download 
>>> precisely 10.3.1 in order to stay safe and we have time to plan 
>>> countermeasure.
>> 
>> If you want to control what you download, right now the safest way is to go 
>> to files.pharo.org <http://files.pharo.org/>, more precisely to 
>> https://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/, and look for your architecture.
>> 
>> There you will find the archives with the binaries we built.
>> Details about naming conventions are found here: 
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/wiki/About-Build-and-Artifacts
>> 
>> That file server stores both released artifacts and intermediate build 
>> results.
>> The released artifact is the first artifact with the corresponding version 
>> tag (e.g., 10.3.1, 10.2.0).
>> This is generally the oldest in timestime, but you can confirm with the tags 
>> on github.
> 
> Also, we improved the artifact naming to include also:
>  - suffixes (alpha, RC, SNAPSHOT)
>  - the distance to the released tag in the format [+x] where x is the commits.

perfect. We use

git describe | sed -e 's/\-\([0-9][0-9]*\)\-.*/.\1/'

for that.
> 
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/pull/870
> 
> We have tested this in the dev branch, I’ll backport this in the stable 
> branch.
> This will allow us to clearly identify the release commit (the one without 
> the +x tag in the name).
> 
super! Thank you for the good work!!

Norbert

> G

Reply via email to