Damien,

The only potential problem is that you assume tests will catch everything.  
However, I think streams are broken, and I will certainly help fix what we 
break in getting them right.

Bill





Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/30/08 9:37 AM >>>
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you verified that your change does not inadvertently modify any
> behavior? Its not likely, but changes like this can introduce subtle bugs.
> For instance, Matrix overrides readStream. So if there exists any use of
> "ReadStream on: aMatrix" that is there to bypass the overridden behavior,
> the code will break.

It should not break anything (if it does, the test will fail and I
will fix things :-)). In fact, ReadStream only deals with
SequenceableStreams so it should be ok. Do you agree?

-- 
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to