Just send me your google email address and I will add you.

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Bill Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stef,
>
> I appear to have a working google account, and it seems willing to let
> me add comments to wiki pages.  Is there more to do to enable me to
> edit?
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
>
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/6/2008 1:53:17 PM >>>
> Yes bill I think that this is important that we get one page with the
>
> proposal
> because we should find a way to make progress.
> May be with a stream factory or other method names as you suggest (if
>
> I understand correctly)
> This is important that we do not lose the ideas and proposal.
>
> Stef
>
> On Jun 6, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Bill Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> wrote:
>>> Lukas,
>>>
>>> Re "I hope that we do not have to implement our own stream
>>> hierarchy as
>>> well."
>>>
>>> I do not intend to be confrontational, but you are over-reacting.
>>> Nothing I am proposing would force you to create a stream
> hierarchy.
>>> Worry not, as I do not see my proposal being accepted anyway.  I
> will
>>> simply add protocol that meets my needs, convert to it, and move
> on.
>>
>> Perhaps the Pharo project is not yet ready for your proposal, with
> so
>> many things yet to be done, but who knows what might happen in the
>> future?  What about documenting your proposal in the wiki?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Victor Rodriguez.
>>
>>
>>> If by your proposal, you mean relying on a default action to
> preserve
>>> behavior, that is not a solution.  The whole point of exceptions is
>
>>> to
>>> fail loudly vs. (potentially) passing garbage into code that might
> or
>>> might not recognize what happened.  The default action makes it too
>
>>> easy
>>> to miss.  The very thing that keeps you happy subjects my customers
>
>>> to
>>> risk that I consider to be unacceptable, especially given that
>>> there are
>>> simple (if tedious) solutions that will avoid the problem.
>>>
>>> My particular RB limitations are based on what is built into
> Dolphin,
>>> and an old version at that.  I need to see what Damien has on
>>> offer.  My
>>> understanding is that the "comment abuse" is greatly reduced
>>> relative to
>>> what I have experienced.  Failing that, there are other text-
>>> processing
>>> methods.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
>>> University of Florida
>>> Department of Anesthesiology
>>> PO Box 100254
>>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>>>
>>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Tel: (352) 846-1285
>>> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>>
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/08 9:13 AM >>>
>>>> The changes I propose would be almost trivial for them to adopt,
> and
>>>> might actually make their lives easier in targeting Dolphin,
> should
>>> they
>>>> wish to do so.
>>>
>>> Yes, I agree. The rewrite engine can fix all these things.
>>>
>>>> All arguments in favor of preserving current behavior have been
>>>> based
>>> on
>>>> backward compatibility - nothing on merits.
>>>
>>> I am only saying that keeping things backward compatible in
> critical
>>> position makes everything easier. Frankly, I like the solution I
>>> proposed and that apparently other people have thought out as well.
>>> You can use both semantics, depending on what makes more sense in
>>> your
>>> context. And best of all, it does not break existing code. I am
>>> missing a reason why Alan Knight think this solution is not good.
>>>
>>>> or Seaside, I would certainly keep Seaside going, though I suspect
>>> the
>>>> Seaside developers would accomodate us in trying to align the
>>> dialects.
>>>
>>> We never forced anybody to align their dialect. If possible, we
>>> always
>>> changed our own code. We introduced compatibility layers that
> porters
>>> can fill or we simply built our own classes. I hope that we do not
>>> have to implement our own stream hierarchy as well.
>>>
>>>> [*] I assume that I will write Dolphin code to export something
> that
>>>> Pharo can load.  If any of you know of a good solution to that
>>> problem,
>>>> please let me know.  In case you are wondering why the renaming is
>>> all
>>>> done in Pharo, it is because it hopefully does a better job of
>>> leaving
>>>> formatting in tact - D5's version of the RB is fairly hostile in
>>>> that
>>>> regard.
>>>
>>> The rewrite engine in Squeak/Pharo reformats all code it touches.
>>> VisualWorks has some improvements in that area. I discussed with
> John
>>> Brant and he said that these improvements are part of the
> open-source
>>> refactoring browser, however the problem is that Cincom modified
> the
>>> code and that the original improvements are not part of the
> download
>>> on John's website. Therefor it is not clear, what code is clean and
>>> what code is commercial.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lukas
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lukas Renggli
>>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to