On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:40 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > hehe, I was also working on those MC tests right now. For > MCWorkingCopyTest>>setUp I don't think you need.. > > repositoryGroup removeRepository: MCCacheRepository default. > Oops, didn't notice I left it in. That was the first approach before recognizing that it is useless :)
> ..as the cache repository is not stored in the group. Else I think > your changes are good. Better than what they did in 3.10, which is to > just remove the test ;) > I had a look afterwards, too! And that is the next test I find to be removed from 3.10. There is always more than one way to have green tests ;) Norbert > --- > > What do we do with #testUnimplementedNonPrimitiveCalls? It was removed > in 3.10 with comment: "This is not really a unit test but a lint test. > The results are interesting in that they point to possible errors, but > this should be handled in a different context." [1] > I suggest that we also remove it. But this method is a good source for > cleanup. We should go though the list to fix stuff. > > Adrian > > [1] http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5889 > > > > > > On Jun 20, 2008, at 10:24 , Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > I uploaded > > > > Monticello-NorbertHartl.317 > > > > to PharoInbox. That fixes two Monticello tests. After > > this fix I have 4 failures left. > > > > Norbert > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
