On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:07 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Ok I was not aware that alain published packages in the inbox. I will  
> go over them.
> Did norbert published his packages finally?
> 
Yes, the necessary ones weren't problematic. Only the RandomCleanup one
which is not essential.

Norbert
> Stef
> 
> On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> 
> > I made 3 more tests pass:
> >
> > - Fixed Monticello to pass MCSnapshotBrowserTest>>testButtonMutex  
> > (Monticello-al.317)
> > - Fix FloatTest to not depend on platform for representation of NaN  
> > bit pattern (KernelTests-al.67)
> > - Remove test testUnimplementedNonPrimitiveCalls (Tests-al.25)
> >
> > So now, using the other fixes of Norbert, the only test failing is  
> > #testUnwindDebuggerWithStep
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Adrian
> >
> > PS: Stef, it seems that the package versions from the last update  
> > you made are still in PharoInbox.
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2008, at 23:11 , Norbert Hartl wrote:
> >
> >> I applied all changes from the inbox and the test
> >> run showed expected results, 2 expected, 4 failures.
> >>
> >> Norbert
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to