I like that.
I think that what I hated about the inria task managers was that every
was separated.
With clear tags, having one large list is better for my eyes. May be
it will not scale but we will see.
I would like to have a list of items that
- I can work on.....
- harvest
When we have 30 min we should not lost 20 on finding info.
Stef
On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
Every now and then someone tries to improve the way to
go by introducing new processes. Most of time nobody likes
them and they fail :)
We have several types of changes that we want to integrate
in pharo:
- enhancements to the platform
- fixes for reported defects
- fixes from another squeak release (e.g. 3.10)
- fixes from other bug databases like mantis
The type of an issue you open on google is pretty near to that.
Just think about it as a source where the change has its origin.
For this purpose I created a Type-Mantis in the tracker to assign
to tickets from mantis we like to integrate. It might be a step
more to do when opening a ticket but the outcome is that we track
a list of things already done.
if you look at
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3AType-Mantis
you can see what I mean. I think this way it is easier to track
things.
What do you think?
Norbert
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
