On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 23:09 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > On Jul 1, 2008, at 22:11 , Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > I had a look at the wiki page of 3dot10 fixes. > > do you mean this page? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ThreeDotTenFixes > We need to check, I think it does not contain all changes because the > final 3.10 image has version number 7159. (We should also not forget > that there is a 3.10.1 and 3.10.2 with more changes.) > > > The wiki page is good but I have the impression > > that putting all changes in the issue tracker could > > be worth it. > > If you think its not too much work, go for it. > > > I would create another type Type-squeak to track every > > update from squeak. I would prefer not to put the > > mantis issues into it but each squeak version. That > > would enable us to see if we are in sync with squeak. > > But I would still point to the Mantis report since it contains > important information. > Yes, I just meant that the type of the issues won't be Type-Mantis. It would be Type-Squeak instead. I include the reference to mantis in the bug description. A minute ago I found that I can't create links in issues. That is annoying. I will include them as text by now.
I'm starting to dislike google code. Norbert > > What do you think? I could do it in the next spare > > time. > > That would be great. I can have a second look after you are done. > > Adrian > > > > > > > Norbert > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
