Yes I will do a pass.
I was waiting to let other people get a chance to review the code
since I do not want to blindly harvest 3.10 updates
Stef
On Jul 7, 2008, at 8:58 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
I did a scan of all packages and there were some underscores
again. Now it should be perfect if you merge them in ascend
number.
I let the ReadStream for now. I think that is a task that has
to be checked on a regular base.
I don't do any further fixes until these are merged. It is
not the best to do if there are multiple fixes with the
same packages.
Norbert
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:55 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
No just the last one which was already treated.
Stef
On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Hi Stef,
On Jul 5, 2008, at 10:02 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
with my newest uploads there are slices waiting for
review:
SLICE-squeak7074fixAsFloat
SLICE-squeak7080
SLICE-squeak7081
SLICE-squeak7082fixRecentBrowser
SLICE-squeak7083
And
SLICE-squeakUpdate7073
I moved it to treated.
and waiting for other feedback.
Does this mean that those changes are harvested, i.e., in the update
stream?
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
