sure
I think that mentioning that if the code is published in the pharo
squeaksource repository and on any squeaksource
repository it is MIT. (I have problem to see people using free
resources for private project)
would be a good addition.
On Aug 15, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Bill Schwab wrote:
Stef,
I need to sign and send you a copy of the agreement. The terms are
fine
- if I give something away, I intend to do just that, and MIT is fine
(anything not GPL is fine<g>). The only small concern I have is that
the agreement does not specify what distinguishes contributed code. I
gather from elsewhere that loading it into a repository is the
trigger.
Would there be any problem defining that in the agreement? I am
simply
looking ahead to conversations with lawyers; I need to at least talk
to
them about it - they get quite upset if left out of things.
If you are agreeable to a change, it might be best to wait until we
see
what, if any, other concerns might arise before updating the web site.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
