2008/9/10 Alexandre Bergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Igor,
>
> Do you have a mailing list on Hydra?
> I think it is important to initiate the creation of a community around this
> idea.
> You may use googlecode for that.
>

there is not much activity in this area, worth creating new mailing list.
Currently, i using squeak-dev or vm-dev mailing list for news & announcements.
I asked community, maybe it is OT, but nobody complained about it,
instead they want it there. :)

> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2008, at 10:44, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> 2008/9/10 Stéphane Ducasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, as i said, putting FreeType into VM is simple thing.
>>>> But maintaining a code base or regular basis is completely different
>>>> thing. I'm not sure i have enough spare time to do this now.
>>>> First, because i'm busy with Hydra VM.
>>>> Second , I think you are aware, that Cog & Hydra will merge in future.
>>>> Before this happens, i have little interest in supporting
>>>> old-fashioned VMs :)
>>>>
>>>> I planning to do a major refactoring in Hydra, after which , an
>>>> Interpreter/ObjectMemory can be simulated in image. But this will have
>>>> a major impact on backward compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> But for minor changes, like in some plugins, it not hurts a lot. I
>>>> think that, if you planning to maintain own VM, then i'll advice to
>>>> split VMMaker package on two separate parts:
>>>> - VM core
>>>> - all plugins
>>>>
>>>> Because VM is a big code bloat , which is hard to manipulate with.
>>>>
>>>> Also, it would be good to have a common code repository, and separate
>>>> tracker of bugs and fixes for VM/plugins, so it will make an
>>>> integration easier for all interesting parties.
>>>
>>> could you push this idea to the VM maintainers or start to do it?
>>
>> yes i could, but do you think that i have a chance to be heard and my
>> point to be accepted? :)
>>
>>> We are talking abut that since years.
>>> I still do not understand I thought that the svn of the vm code was such
>>> common
>>> code repository?
>>
>> I tried to raise this topic on board meeting, concerning status of
>> VM-dev group and the answer was like:
>> - we already have things set up, and each maintainer know/doing things
>> well.
>> I'm not sure about current status, but i keep feeling that VM
>> maintainers efforts dissipating due to lack of
>> communication/collaboration.
>> Maybe it is because i'm relatively new, and missing info about how
>> things was set up long ago, before i came in,  maybe people really
>> collaborate behind the scenes, i don't know.
>> What i really sure about, is that , it will not hurt to call for a
>> status (re)clarification to know who doing what and how things
>> working.
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to