esteban
I think that you can really use pharo for development and give us
feedback.
for deployment you may switch in alpha phase if needed.
The path will be long but the journey is really worth :)
Stef
On Sep 16, 2008, at 8:06 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answers.
The main reason I want to run the application on Pharo is because
I'm agree with it's objetives, and I been following the project
advance through the list and I'm very happy with the ongoing work.
Unfortunately, I'm to busy to offer some help... but maybe I can
help on "testing" by using Pharo on a commercial project...
So, following Adrian suggestion, as my project will take 4-5 months
of development, I think the best path should be to wait a little and
start using Pharo in a couple of months.
And of course, I want to produce professional applications, so what
better to use a professional version of squeak? :)
Cheers,
Esteban
On 2008-09-16 13:49:48 -0300, Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi Esteban
As Stef said, you should not run into major problems because the core
on which a Seaside application usually depends has not changed
much. The parts of Pharo that have undergone major changes (or
that have been totally removed) will likely not affect you.
I think that you should also take into account when you plan to go
live. If this is in just another week or two, I would not go for
Pharo. However, if this is a larger project that takes longer, then I
suggest to use Pharo. I think we will be fast to fix bugs if you
report them (whereas at the Squeak side the activity seems to be a
bit
less than over here ;)). And over time more and more people will
start
to use Pharo in professional projects too.
Please let us know how you decide and in case you run into any
troubles that need our attention.
Cheers,
Adrian
On Sep 16, 2008, at 18:02 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Esteban
Lukas is developing seaside on pharo. Netstyle will certainly use it
once the first release is out.
Now the point is do you need the improvements we are doing?
May be 3.9 is good enough or pavel image.
From a stability point of view the changes are currently low from
api changes - we are cleaning a lot
but not changing. And this may change a bit in the
future but this is ineluctable. If people want something better they
have to ack changes.
We will also try to keep changes to the minimum but not less. We
want a better system
and as such it will change.
Stef
On Sep 16, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to start a new commercial, seaside based project in a
few weeks, and I wish to start it in Pharo, but I'm afraid is
not very stable yet...
Can somebody tell me if is usable right now and if not, more or
less when it will be?
Thanks,
Esteban
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
