On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:42 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > did you flush the changesets ? > because it keeps a reference also to any changes. > Ah, learned something new :) That freed more than 1 megabyte. So it is 5% smaller than squeak. Any other hints? :)
thanks, Norbert > Stef > > On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have problems in understanding the image size of pharo. > > I monitored it since we started and I did not recognize > > a notably change. So I took a pharo 10073 and squeak 3.10.2 > > for comparsion. > > yes frustrating after removing MVC and more. > > > > Amount classes, amount methods and lines of code are all 10% > > less in pharo. But the image is approx. 0,5% - 1% smaller > > than the squeak one. > > > > To clarify this. I closed all windows and did condenseChanges > > and garbageCollect, flushed the monticello cache... > > > > What could be the reason for this? > > > > thanks, > > > > Norbert > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
