What if we show the super icon only if there's no sub-
implementation and otherwise the sub-implementation icon?
no this is terrible because we cannot rely on the consistency of
the information
Or one containing both information, but I guess you won't like
that. ;)
I think that this is what we should have
So we need an icon with a (green) up arrow (for super send) and a
(yellow) triangle pointing down (for overriddes). Who could draw
something like that? ;))
I can :)
I will try.
now I think that you should try also with inkscape.
The icons do not have to look good for now. We should get them right.
After somebody with talent can relook them.
- The same is for abstract method icon. When browsing the
protocol/interface I don't need to know that. I am more
interested if
any of the subclasses override it.
ok, I agree here.
I disagree there.
Browse stream and collection.
I meant that the icon should show whether the abstract method is
overridden or not. What about keeping the cyan icon for abstract
methods, but as a triangle pointing south when the method is
overridden and as a square when it's not?
or nothing when it is not?
Try to come up with a nice model.
Then after we should see how we can sell it also as a paper.
David
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
