On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Matthew Fulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PackageInfo is not that complicated.
Some might even say it's rather simplistic >:] It would make sense to have real objects reify the code organization. > Can you give me an example of why you want one method in two > packages? Monticello can handle that by using overrides, but it > is a different version in each package. I guess he meant method categories (protocols) ? -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
