Igor Stasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 2008/10/10 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse <at> inria.fr>: > > Yeap it would be good to fix that. > > for me > > > > #2 -> #'2' > > ## -> #'#' > > so, > ##word > should be treated as: > > '#' asSymbol word > > ?
## is questionable: we can accept such a syntax, but what for exactly? If no valuable reason, shouldn't we better enforce syntaxic check in Parser and signal malformed statements as an error as would any other Smalltalk? Quite sure that NewCompiler already fix all this stuff. What are the plans about its integration? Waiting for Eliot's COG? _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
