On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Dan Corneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a change set with the proper fix for the issue.
What was the problem with the other one? > Do you think it is possible that someone reviews it before you include > it in the image? The feature did not work before so it can't be worse :-). > This time I think I got it right. I've also added 2 unit tests. > Nevertheless, I would be more confident if someone reviews it :) > > P.S. > Do you think it would be better to make a Monticello SLICE and publish > it to PharoInbox SqueakSource repository? No, it has nothing to do with Pharo. -- Damien Cassou Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
