On 10/30/08 12:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
gwenael what lukas is implying is that this is important that you
publish your work in a place
where other people can read it.

Off course I'll publish it ! I've just asked him about these modifications with the tokens hierarchy.

By the way I've made a stupid benchmark between the Parser and RBParser on the entire image and RBParser is 5 sec slower than Parser (122 sec for the RBParser and 117 sec for the Parser)


Stef

On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Gwenael Casaccio wrote:

On 10/29/08 6:21 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
As I've said to you Marcus, I've worked on the RBParser/RBScanner. I've
fixed these classes and now you can parse the entire image. At this
moment
the refactoring is not yet finished but I've made some good progress.

Good news.

I was not aware that you were working on RBParser. Stef told me that
you also improved the refactorings. I think you should commit and work
on the public repository to get more attention. I guess there were
many other changes going on in RB codebase in the meantime.

Cheers,
Lukas


I've also discused with stef and marcus and I would like to have only
RBToken. I don't know what do you think ?


Cheers,
Gwenael

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to